Teams

AYTC-Nocom

2026 Coed 18-39 · 3.0 Coed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-07vs RTC-Hits and Giggles-MundtSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesMakena Barickman / Ankita Mehrotra vs Anh Nguyen / Liling Yuan6-2
L#1 Male SinglesEtzael Garcia vs Phillip Pham1-6
2026-02-21vs WSC-Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesPhi Hoang / Bao Vu vs Tudor Fanaru / Paul Druta5-6
L#1 Male SinglesEtzael Garcia vs Tudor Fanaru5-6
2026-01-24vs ETC-Serve-vivors-ZhangWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesBethany Haddad vs Lizzy Feng6-3
2026-01-18vs CAC/SL-Net Results-StiebritzLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesBethany Haddad / Makena Barickman vs Jika Akmatova / Allison Apfelbaum3-6
L#1 Female SinglesBethany Haddad vs Allison Apfelbaum4-6
L#1 Male SinglesPhi Hoang vs Jordan Stiebritz5-6
2026-01-11vs BTA-My Backhand Sucks-LauWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesBethany Haddad / Makena Barickman vs Wen Cui / Yuchen Zhang6-3
W#1 Female SinglesBethany Haddad vs Jessmin Lau6-4
W#1 Male SinglesPhi Hoang vs Jonathan Wang6-4
2026-01-02vs AYTC-SharmaSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesBethany Haddad vs Cynthia Wang6-4
L#1 Male DoublesBrian Quach / Etzael Garcia vs Prateek Sharma / Kurt Nikaitani2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Coed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Jonas Albert Nocom
published
2.81
Bethany Haddad
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Phi Hoang
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Brian Quach
published 3
2.68
Etzael Garcia
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Makena Barickman
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Bao Vu
published 3
2.60
Lawrence Paltep
published
Ankita Mehrotra
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonas Albert Nocom
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Bethany Haddad
34W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Phi Hoang
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Brian Quach
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Etzael Garcia
2W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Makena Barickman
18W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Bao Vu
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Lawrence Paltep
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Ankita Mehrotra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.