Teams

MLF BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-16vs MEA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeon Patchett / Christopher Fox vs Matt Schwartz / James Callanan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Meister / Reeves Anderson vs Jeffrey Santelices / Keaton Howe4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShawn Farnell / Kevin Ellis vs Peter Walters / Joshua Harrison5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-09vs TTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Jackson / Reeves Anderson vs Anthony Garcia / Ian Harris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Ellis / Dennis Crow vs Marcel de Graaf / Eric Jaggers6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Bolton / Leon Patchett vs Steven Alvarado / Philip Dixon-Patterson6-2, 6-0
2026-06-25vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeon Patchett / Scott Schaffer vs Xinlin Li / Johan Mudsam3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Fox / Andrew Meister vs Erik Houseman / Steve Bennett6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShawn Farnell / Branko Banic vs James Bray / Peter Braun3-6, 6-7
2026-06-18vs LTA-Q GOLDWon 40
W#1 DoublesShawn Farnell / Christopher Fox vs Brian Carlson / David Henderson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Meister vs Wayne Sidney4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesReeves Anderson / Scott Schaffer vs Mark Hinman / Michael Bombulie6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Bolton / Branko Banic vs Idi Omar / Joseph Fryberger6-1, 6-2
2026-06-11vs HMTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesScott Bolton / Kevin Ellis vs Todd Rosenzweig / Dale Oberlag6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeon Patchett vs Michael Wagner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Fox / Dennis Crow vs Marco Scalise / Michael Gugliotto7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShawn Farnell / Daniel Jackson vs Christian Muna / Michael Dirvonas6-4, 6-3
2026-06-04vs RCC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Jackson / Dennis Crow vs Eric Maier / AJ Johnson6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCarlos Cobos vs Graham Hill2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesScott Schaffer / Kevin Ellis vs Andrew Schifle / Craig Hoeltgen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Bolton / Reeves Anderson vs Alex Pedersen / Paul Kolachov3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Scott Bolton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Dennis Crow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Andrew Meister
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Leon Patchett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.36
Kevin Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Christopher Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Reeves Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Scott Schaffer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Branko Banic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Carlos Cobos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Schaffer + Dennis Crow4158% games+4.7% vs expected
Kevin Ellis + Christopher Fox8456% games+2.3% vs expected
Dennis Crow + Christopher Fox7160% games+0.0% vs expected
Reeves Anderson + Shawn Farnell3251% games−4.6% vs expected
Kevin Ellis + Scott Schaffer13657% games−5.2% vs expected
Shawn Farnell + Dennis Crow1645% gamesnot enough data
Scott Schaffer + Christopher Fox4259% gamesnot enough data
Scott Bolton + Scott Schaffer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Scott Bolton
43W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Dennis Crow
38W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Andrew Meister
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Leon Patchett
21W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Kevin Ellis
73W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Christopher Fox
54W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Reeves Anderson
92W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Scott Schaffer
97W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Branko Banic
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Cobos
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.