Teams

Bellone/40/3.0/NOD/CP

2023 NO Adult 40 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
3.25
Jessica Kee
published
Bridget Lawrence
published 3.5
3.23
Laura Bernard
published
3.19
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
published 3.5
3.17
Charlotte Ducote
published 3.5
3.16
Jill Bellone
published
3.13
Kristy Gentry
published
3.08
Kelsi Schmitz
published
3.06
Brandy Bellina
published 3.5
3.02
Tania Kirn
published
2.93
Beth Generes
published 3
2.85
Mar'Sue Parro
published
2.77
Lisa McPherson
published
Brooke Harris
published 3
2.73
Carla Olsen
published 3
2.69
Kimberly Buchler
published
2.65
Chalon Case
published 3
Kelly Kloor
published
Lauren Tucker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsi Schmitz + Jessica Kee6650% games+4.0% vs expected
Brandy Bellina + Rebel Daigle Salsbury3349% games−4.1% vs expected
Tania Kirn + Carla Olsen51340% games−11.4% vs expected
Kelsi Schmitz + Lisa McPherson314 matchesnot enough data
Kelsi Schmitz + Kristy Gentry314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Kee + Lisa McPherson224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Bellone + Brandy Bellina213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Bellone + Charlotte Ducote123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebel Daigle Salsbury
84W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
Jessica Kee
39W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bridget Lawrence
7W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Bernard
52W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
JENNIFER CAPITELLI
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Charlotte Ducote
35W–30L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Jill Bellone
29W–37L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
Kristy Gentry
39W–24L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kelsi Schmitz
66W–52L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Brandy Bellina
67W–49L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Tania Kirn
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
3.02
3
Beth Generes
48W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mar'Sue Parro
25W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.85
Lisa McPherson
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brooke Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carla Olsen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Kimberly Buchler
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Chalon Case
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Kelly Kloor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Tucker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.