Teams

Aulisa/Shank

2026 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 3.5 Mens

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-18vs PerrinLost 03
L#1 DoublesBladen Fuller / Samuel Baker vs James Perrin / Travis Funk4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Bharat Kakarala2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesRobert Craig vs Chase Gentry5-7, 5-7
2026-05-11vs Waldo/CarsonWon 31
L#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Robert Craig vs Jake Waldo / Hayden Farquhar3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRusty Shaw / AJ Funk vs John Roberts / Jerry Jerabek6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Aidan Culwell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGabriel Axelrud / Marty Cleckler vs Jacob Arguellez / Chad Landrum6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs BerryWon 50
W#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / AJ Funk vs James Mccord / Trenten McCowen6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Aron Berry6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Bladen Fuller vs Alan Berry / Garry Burson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRobert Craig vs Thad Reid6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiego Morais Moreira / Brandon Shaw vs Bryce Hamlin / Ryan Robertson6-0, 6-2
2026-04-27vs SpearsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobert Craig / John Chad Carter vs David Rowell / Patrick McLaurin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAJ Funk / Samuel Baker vs Jeasik Cho / Hung Tran6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRusty Shaw vs Stanley Brewer6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Gabriel Axelrud vs Kirk Spears / John Kyle Wooldridge1-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs PerrinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSamuel Baker / Robert Craig vs Kerry Thompson / Chase Gentry4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrandon Shaw vs Stephen Shewmake4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEugenio Aulisa / John Chad Carter vs James Perrin / Brandon Hamilton6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRusty Shaw / Gabriel Axelrud vs JB Henderson / Travis Isom6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-08vs SpearsLost 13
W#1 DoublesRobert Craig / John Chad Carter vs Stanley Brewer / Simon Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Alexander Blake2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiego Morais Moreira / Eugenio Aulisa vs John Kyle Wooldridge / Christopher Gregorcyk5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRusty Shaw / Bladen Fuller vs David Rowell / Patrick McLaurin4-6, 1-6
2026-04-06vs Waldo/CarsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Rusty Shaw vs Hayden Farquhar / Parker Carson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAJ Funk / Bladen Fuller vs Jake Waldo / Matt Hall2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBrandon Shaw vs Aidan Culwell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiego Morais Moreira / Gabriel Axelrud vs Jerry Jerabek / Cade Landrum4-6, 0-6
2026-03-23vs BerryWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / AJ Funk vs Timothy Byars / Trenten McCowen6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Alan Berry3-0
W#2 DoublesSamuel Baker / Robert Craig vs Keith Robertson / Ryan Robertson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mens
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Waldo/Carson53291126259
2Aulisa/Shank44211944328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Vinicius MacHado
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.44
John Chad Carter
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.37
AJ Funk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Rusty Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.30
Eugenio Aulisa
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.20
Marty Cleckler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Robert Craig
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.09
Brandon Shaw
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Gabriel Axelrud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Bladen Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Diego Morais Moreira
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rusty Shaw + John Chad Carter4255% games+3.1% vs expected
Robert Craig + Rusty Shaw044 matchesnot enough data
Eugenio Aulisa + John Chad Carter314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Craig + John Chad Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vinicius MacHado
26W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
John Chad Carter
36W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
AJ Funk
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Rusty Shaw
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Eugenio Aulisa
18W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Marty Cleckler
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Robert Craig
12W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Brandon Shaw
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Gabriel Axelrud
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Bladen Fuller
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Diego Morais Moreira
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.