Teams

9-MMacdonald-HS-55 /3.0

2023 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-02vs 3-JSykes-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Nagelhout / Louise Tabron vs Beth Clark / Debbie Michnowicz0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Naden / Bay Scott vs Mary T Long / Nancy Sickel1-6, 1-6
2023-04-25vs 7-YDeaver 55 -SBLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Bradfield / Linda Nagelhout vs Jimi Harrison / Karen Maus3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brown / Bay Scott vs Kellie Johnson / Janet Ranheim4-6, 6-7
2023-04-18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Nagelhout / Louise Tabron vs Lyn Billings / Ann Weissler5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Naden / Bay Scott vs Helen Koo / Bonnie Rogers3-6, 2-6
2023-04-11vs 6-DWebb-WWWon 10
W#1 DoublesDori Liller / Mary Macdonald vs Beverly Fedewa / Nancy Stovall7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-04vs 1-CCleary-HRLost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Kreuzkamp / Linda Nagelhout vs Claire Bassett / Martha Schulwitz1-6, 2-6
2023-03-28vs 8-LOakley-CHCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Macdonald / Dori Liller vs Laurie Rechholtz / Karen Sapir7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberly Roberts / Linda Nagelhout vs Carolyn Hightower / Judi Seagroves3-6, 6-7
2023-03-14vs 2-JOREGAN-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Brown / Linda Nagelhout vs Jane Finch / Rachel Hawkins6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-28vs 4-RKronmiller-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brown / Linda Nagelhout vs Regina Kronmiller / Mary Hanlon3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Louise Tabron
published 3
2.87
Mary Macdonald
published
2.78
Deborah Brown
published 3
2.70
Linda Nagelhout
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Kristen Bradfield
published
2.56
Dori Liller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.40
Bay Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.32
Linda Naden
published
Theresa Kreuzkamp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Liller + Linda Nagelhout123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Louise Tabron
30W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
2.88
Mary Macdonald
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Deborah Brown
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Linda Nagelhout
45W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Kristen Bradfield
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Dori Liller
104W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
Linda Naden
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.32
Theresa Kreuzkamp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.