Teams

DRC One Love

2026 18&Over Women · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-20vs Southern:TSRLost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Bacon / Katherine Stikkers vs Elizabeth Flynn-Rand / Lisa Arnoff3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEileen Kaisik vs Christa Tomasulo3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Spreer / Sheri Lynch vs Courtney Clayton / Maria Kurshan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-29vs Southern:TSRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Spreer / Sheri Lynch vs Lisa Arnoff / Lisa Mazochi3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEileen Kaisik vs Gladys Escalante2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDarlene Brandow / Erica Bacon vs Jasmin Ford / Laurie Hutchison2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs Southern:TSRLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarlene Brandow / Monica Lewis vs Lisa Mazochi / Louise Bald0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Stikkers vs Gladys Escalante0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Lynch / Jennifer Spreer vs Chelaine Jones / Melissa Russo1-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs Southern:TSRLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathleen Andreucci / Darlene Brandow vs Louise Bald / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErica Bacon / Katherine Stikkers vs Maria Kurshan / Jasmin Ford1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Monica Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Cathleen Andreucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Eileen Kaisik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.03
Jennifer Spreer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.98
Darlene Brandow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.90
Sheri Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.74
Katherine Stikkers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jody Milholm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Spreer + Sheri Lynch21036% games−3.2% vs expected
Darlene Brandow + Katherine Stikkers1829% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Lewis
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Cathleen Andreucci
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Eileen Kaisik
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Jennifer Spreer
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Darlene Brandow
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Sheri Lynch
6W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Katherine Stikkers
2W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Jody Milholm
11W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.