Teams

FV:Victorious Secret:Riccio

2021 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-07vs SIMS:Dare Doubles:SteinbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Meg Castineiras vs Amy Steinberg / Marisa Sullivan7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-11-30vs FV:Double Trouble:CrowalWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeg Castineiras / Rachel Buchanan vs Cassandra Crowal / Nicole Byer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-16vs SIMS:Dare Doubles:SteinbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Hilary Donald vs Nan Flanagan / Amy Steinberg6-0, 7-5
2021-11-09vs FV:Double Trouble:CrowalWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeg Castineiras / Hilary Donald vs Christina Wilde / Cassandra Crowal6-4, 6-4
2021-11-04vs GTC:Queens of the Court:MabeWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeg Castineiras / Hilary Donald vs JoAnne Ramm / Melinda Smith6-2, 6-2
2021-10-26vs SIMS:Dare Doubles:SteinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesHilary Donald / Lisa Riccio vs Amy Pascal / Nan Flanagan4-6, 3-6
2021-10-19vs FV:Double Trouble:CrowalLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Riccio / Rachel Buchanan vs Cassandra Crowal / Christina Wilde1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-10-15vs GTC:Queens of the Court:MabeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeg Castineiras / Lisa Riccio vs Melinda Smith / JoAnne Ramm6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-10-05vs SIMS:Dare Doubles:SteinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeg Castineiras / Rachel Buchanan vs Nan Flanagan / Marisa Sullivan2-6, 4-6
2021-09-28vs FV:Double Trouble:CrowalLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Lisa Riccio vs Cassandra Crowal / Nicole Byer5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Double Trouble:Crowal75751185
2SIMS:Dare Doubles:Steinberg75751196
3FV:Victorious Secret:Riccio55551297
4GTC:Queens of the Court:Mabe373716112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rachel Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Hilary Donald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Meg Castineiras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Lisa Riccio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary Donald + Meg Castineiras11947% games+4.7% vs expected
Lisa Riccio + Rachel Buchanan7360% games+4.0% vs expected
Lisa Riccio + Hilary Donald224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Riccio + Meg Castineiras134 matchesnot enough data
Meg Castineiras + Rachel Buchanan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Buchanan
91W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Hilary Donald
85W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Meg Castineiras
91W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lisa Riccio
71W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.