Teams

BAIN-Wiggins

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.47 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-26vs BC-KaptikWon 50
W#1 DoublesAnnie Graebner / Stacey McFadden vs Katherine Walker / Barb Moe6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCorinne Wolffe vs Shera Myers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Wiechers / Eleanor Gray vs YoungHae Chu / Christina Bear6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmily Wooton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Viele / Lisa Wiggins vs Valerie Berberoglu / Angela Ahluwalia6-2, 6-3
2022-05-19vs RBW-MacAttack-McAllenWon 32
W#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Jackie Osland vs Kimberly McCallum / Joanne Bastian6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKim Screen vs Winly Tang3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErica Wiechers / Eleanor Gray vs Elaine McCall / Madalena McAllen6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAmanda Bast vs Alissa Williams6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Viele / Lisa Wiggins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-12vs WSC-Momentum-HarrisWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Annie Graebner vs Marla Vasilatos / Becky Holtzinger6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErica Wiechers / Michele Lesnik vs Lori Harris / Kitty Close6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKim Screen vs Tammi Walker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Snider / Jacki Malitzski vs Debra Egge / Rose Marie Gai6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs AYTC-Ballers-NisetLost 23
L#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Jackie Osland vs Mila Niset / Katrina Miller5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Wooton vs Evelyn Bozzuti1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErica Wiechers / Eleanor Gray vs Jennifer Combs / Kay Coghlan7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCorinne Wolffe vs Anne Dickinson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Stephanie Viele vs Toby Miller / Leona De Rocco6-2, 7-5
2022-05-05vs PL-KirkwoodLost 23
W#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Annie Graebner vs Judy Simmons / Carla Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Wooton vs Marisa Preciado6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichele Lesnik / Erica Wiechers vs Trisha Hoss / Renee Fletcher2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKim Screen vs Carol LaMoria3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor Gray / Norma Miner vs Alice Kirkwood / Tina Sypher2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-04vs STC-CahoonLost 14
W#1 DoublesAnnie Graebner / Eleanor Gray vs Sally Revere / Diana Stroble6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacey McFadden vs Erin Lea4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Snider / Nancy Lobisser vs Sarah Owens / Kathleen Perkins6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichele Lesnik vs Stacey Campbell3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Stephanie Viele vs Julie Bouscaren / Gail Pratt6-7, 3-6
2022-04-28vs TCSP-LampittWon 41
W#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Annie Graebner vs Patricia Coats / Arpana Goel6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmanda Bast vs Carly Baker2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEleanor Gray / Michele Lesnik vs Jamie Lampitt / Jennifer Harris6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmily Wooton vs Andrea Lang6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Viele / Lisa Wiggins vs Amy Rotival / Jamie Carr6-4, 6-0
2022-04-14vs CP-Wu/FusettiSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStacey McFadden / Eleanor Gray vs Karin Fusetti / Cathy Long6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErica Wiechers / Michele Lesnik vs Carla Stanford / Zhanbing Wu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKim Screen vs Emily Christensen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNorma Miner / Jacki Malitzski vs Maria Borgen / Yoshimi Gershaw3-6, 4-6
2022-04-07vs ETC-LarsenLost 04
L#1 DoublesNorma Miner / Kim Screen vs Sheila Bernstein / Kelly Buck0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Stephanie Viele vs Shannon Corbett / Lyrma Santodomingo1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Martin vs Nozomi Park1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Lobisser / Jacki Malitzski vs Ursula Heenan / Ginny Larsen3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Stacey McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Annie Graebner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.45
Jackie Osland
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.44
Emily Wooton
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.36
Lisa Wiggins
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Erica Wiechers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michele Lesnik
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Norma Miner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Eleanor Gray
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.17
Amanda Bast
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Aileen Bergstrom
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Stephanie Viele
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
Corinne Wolffe
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.93
Elizabeth Martin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Dawn Snider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jacki Malitzski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kim Screen
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Lobisser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey McFadden + Annie Graebner9363% games+8.6% vs expected
Jackie Osland + Amanda Bast17657% games+6.7% vs expected
Jackie Osland + Eleanor Gray6264% games+4.3% vs expected
Eleanor Gray + Erica Wiechers3251% games+2.3% vs expected
Lisa Wiggins + Stephanie Viele201754% games+1.3% vs expected
Jackie Osland + Norma Miner3249% games+0.7% vs expected
Norma Miner + Aileen Bergstrom3253% games−0.3% vs expected
Erica Wiechers + Corinne Wolffe4251% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacey McFadden
36W–25L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Annie Graebner
47W–13L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jackie Osland
107W–66L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Emily Wooton
24W–11L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Lisa Wiggins
37W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Erica Wiechers
37W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Michele Lesnik
23W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Norma Miner
43W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Eleanor Gray
22W–15L career · 11 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Amanda Bast
64W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Aileen Bergstrom
72W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Stephanie Viele
31W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Corinne Wolffe
33W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Elizabeth Martin
28W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Dawn Snider
11W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Jacki Malitzski
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Screen
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Lobisser
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.