Teams

Femia/Lowell/SRC

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-24vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTyler Taake / Buffy Carter vs Brent Jimenez / Gabriela Bottger3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMimi Luong / Jacob Cockrell vs Melanie Neal / Deric Neal7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJackson Ritchey / Nellie Beall vs Laurie Letts / Luke Momo6-0, 7-5
2026-07-21vs Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/MRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBianca Femia / Jacob Cockrell vs Mark Popejoy / Sarah White6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFaith Hendricks / Ashton Bowman vs Mish Gonzalez / Joshua Ammons6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNellie Beall / Clay Galloway vs Stephanie Bryant / Austin Murray6-2, 6-3
2026-07-13vs Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/MatrixWon 30
W#1 DoublesMimi Luong / Daniel Short vs Sarah Bright / Paul Hawron6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBianca Femia / Ashton Bowman vs Shaun Stacey / Mandy Shelton6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClay Galloway / Nellie Beall vs Natalie Gorman / Steven Smith3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-08vs Abdin/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Femia / Ashton Bowman vs Evan Rush / Lauren Shillcutt6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBuffy Carter / Jackson Ritchey vs Carrie Overton / Nate Mullen6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFaith Hendricks / Ahmed Khan vs SANDEEP KANAMALA / Callie Brannon4-6, 4-6
2026-07-01vs Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBianca Femia / Ashton Bowman vs Steven Adair / Monte Broussard6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBuffy Carter / Jackson Ritchey vs Tyler Quattlebaum / Kathryn Stark3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNellie Beall / Clay Galloway vs Anna Scott Chesshir / Jake Ladue6-2, 6-3
2026-06-22vs Mejia/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Femia / Ashton Bowman vs Nicolas Mejia / Nery Iselin6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Short / Faith Hendricks vs Katy Lollar / Kevin Lollar6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTyler Taake / Sarah Paschal vs Patrick Wright / Carolina Mejia6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJacob Cockrell / Bianca Femia vs Stan Rodgers / Haley Starks6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMimi Luong / Daniel Short vs Jamia Weir / Hunter Fry6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNellie Beall / Ahmed Khan vs Jeff Gabbard / Lisa Stafford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Femia/Lowell/SRC701839146
2Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix6115613139
3Neal/Rogers/SVCC43111021190
4Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/MRC3481329195
5Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC1661530215
6Mejia/Rogers/SVCC1661533229
7Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC1661534239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Harrison Heien
published
3.58
Jackson Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Daniel Short
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Clay Galloway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Mimi Luong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Ahmed Khan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jacob Cockrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Bianca Femia
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Ashton Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Nellie Beall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Buffy Carter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Tyler Taake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Sarah Paschal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Faith Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashton Bowman + Bianca Femia404 matchesnot enough data
Clay Galloway + Nellie Beall303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Harrison Heien
23W–9L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jackson Ritchey
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Daniel Short
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Clay Galloway
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mimi Luong
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Ahmed Khan
14W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Jacob Cockrell
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Bianca Femia
19W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ashton Bowman
8W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Nellie Beall
27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Buffy Carter
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Tyler Taake
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sarah Paschal
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Faith Hendricks
22W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.