Teams

GSTL40/Repasky/RLTC

2026 Adult 40 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-16vs GSTL40/Yates/DunesLost 04
L#1 DoublesLynn Repasky / Caroline Vymislicky vs Annie Williams / Margaret Singleton0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Banning vs Sandye Hicks5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Parker / Gail Romano vs Katherine Edge / Maryann Gaddy1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVera Reznik / Louise Wine vs Kimberly Gore / Patty Gresko1-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs GSTL 3.0W 40 & Over (Nisbet)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Banning / Sandra Martin vs Renee Nisbet / Karen Bellamy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Repasky / Caroline Vymislicky vs Diane Fribance / Deanna Durst1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGail Romano / Louise Wine vs Jayne Spencer / Josielou Stevens0-6, 1-6
2026-03-09vs GSTL 3.0W 40 & Over (Nisbet)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesLynn Repasky / Gail Romano vs Renee Nisbet / Lindsay Gardner0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Banning vs Deanna Durst1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Buchanan / Vera Reznik vs Josielou Stevens / Jeannine Siembida0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Unger / Patricia Werder vs Ann Foster / Karen Bellamy1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesTraci Bridges / Louise Wine vs Marina Miroff / Kay Dobis0-6, 3-6
2026-02-12vs GSTL40/Yates/DunesLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatricia Werder / Kimberly Danowski vs Pamela Yates / Annie Williams6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Buchanan vs Joan Spencer-Ruper4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Parker / Karen Banning vs Kimberly Gore / Georgeanne Rice2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Bridges / Louise Wine vs Andrea Lazar / Caylyne Arnold4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caroline Vymislicky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Kimberly Danowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Patricia Werder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Karen Banning
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Vera Reznik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Lynn Repasky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Louise Wine
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Mary Buchanan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Gail Romano
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Traci Bridges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.11
Ann Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Patricia Unger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Vymislicky
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Danowski
25W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Patricia Werder
15W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Karen Banning
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Vera Reznik
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Lynn Repasky
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Louise Wine
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.38
Mary Buchanan
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Gail Romano
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Traci Bridges
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Ann Parker
2W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Patricia Unger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Martin
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.