Teams

CVTA ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-07-17vs BTA-CU YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Kinney / Josh Lee vs Gary McBride / Brad Begin1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJay Beshore / John Healy vs Stephen Richter / Dean Rector0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Beard / Ted Hine vs Rich Gribbon / Ryan Hanneman1-6, 2-6
2023-06-20vs BTA-CU YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesJosh Lee / Marc Hafner vs Gary McBride / Brad Begin3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Kinney vs John Hoeffler6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Healy / Norwood Keel vs Andy Allison / Ryan Hanneman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJay Beshore / Ted Hine vs Dean Rector / Rich Gribbon6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ryan Kinney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.52
Richard Beard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Marc Hafner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Norwood Keel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eugene Kutscher
published
Jay Beshore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Josh Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ted Hine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Kinney + Josh Lee5160% games+13.0% vs expected
Ted Hine + Richard Beard1933% games−5.1% vs expected
Richard Beard + Norwood Keel0520% games−13.0% vs expected
Richard Beard + Marc Hafner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Kinney
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Richard Beard
10W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
Marc Hafner
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Norwood Keel
1W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.25
Eugene Kutscher
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jay Beshore
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Josh Lee
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Hine
1W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.