Teams

Marion - FK/Walsh

2021 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-26vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Jeanne Walsh / Valerie Elvin vs Diane Stablein / Sally Perkins2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Marianne Marcoux vs Phyllis Matthews / Joanne Collier7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-19vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteWon 20
W#2 DoublesJan Cole / Valerie Elvin vs Joanne Collier / Patricia Diedrich6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Pamelia Payne vs Elfriede Meyer / Pauline Stropp7-6, 7-5
2021-03-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesValerie Elvin / Jan Cole vs Phyllis Matthews / Vicki Collins6-1, 6-2
2021-03-05vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Jan Cole vs Diane Stablein / Linda Jones1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesValerie Elvin / Pamelia Payne vs Sherry Ruschell / Joanne Collier7-5, 6-4
2021-02-25vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Rozboril / Valerie Elvin vs Diane Stablein / Linda Jones0-6, 3-6
2021-02-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Linda Brown vs Linda Jones / Patricia Diedrich7-5, 6-2
2021-01-22vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Linda Brown vs Linda Jones / Diane Stablein2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Fetzer / Irma Buttermore vs Rita Wilhelm / Pauline Stropp7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Valerie Elvin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.35
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Jan Cole
published 3.5
Linda Brown
published
Nancy Fetzer
published
Nancy Little
published
Pamelia Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamelia Payne + Irma Buttermore5941% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 7 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Linda Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Fetzer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamelia Payne
36W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.