Teams

Peterson - Mazarick

2022 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-05vs Combs - Gates FourLost 02
L#1 SinglesBetty Peterson vs Lori Hawkins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEricka Zumwalt / Lydia Apollo vs Gwenda Combs / Teresa MacK2-6, 6-7
2022-04-27vs Haugh - Highland CCLost 12
L#1 SinglesBetty Peterson vs Caroline Parks0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLydia Apollo / Wendy Vonnegut vs Lauren Blashford / Eydie Hammaker1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Sisk / Theresa Jones vs Martha Lerario / Catherine Brown6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-06vs Combs - Gates FourLost 03
L#1 DoublesEricka Zumwalt / Linda Caesar vs Yvonne Rouse / Lynne McDonough6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBetty Peterson vs Lori Hawkins0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Sisk / Theresa Jones vs Tammy Keller / Denise Bauer Frazier3-6, 6-7
2022-03-17vs Haugh - Highland CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesEricka Zumwalt / Amy Bradley vs Caroline Parks / Meredith Weinstein5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Jones / Betty Peterson vs Eydie Hammaker / Murtis Worth2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Sisk / Lydia Apollo vs Lauren Blashford / Catherine Brown2-6, 4-6
2022-03-13vs Combs - Gates FourLost 02
L#2 DoublesEricka Zumwalt / Linda Caesar vs Kathy Fick / Denise Bauer Frazier2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWinona Gee / Betty Peterson vs Gwenda Combs / Sarah Hallock0-6, 0-6
2022-02-24vs Haugh - Highland CCLost 02
L#2 DoublesLydia Apollo / Betty Peterson vs Martha Lerario / Catherine Brown3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Sisk / Jillian Ballantyne vs Esther Thompson / Cyndi Levine4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Ericka Zumwalt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Amanda Klinck
published 3
2.79
Lydia Apollo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Linda Caesar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Heather Sisk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Betty Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.54
Amy Bradley
published 3
2.50
Susan Mazikowski
published 3
2.33
Wendy Vonnegut
published
Jillian Ballantyne
published
Joy Williams
published
LaJune Ray
published
Winona Gee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Sisk + Lydia Apollo5555% gamesnot enough data
Ericka Zumwalt + Lydia Apollo3551% gamesnot enough data
Betty Peterson + Lydia Apollo044 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Vonnegut + Betty Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ericka Zumwalt
94W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Amanda Klinck
3W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Lydia Apollo
72W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Linda Caesar
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Heather Sisk
51W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Betty Peterson
38W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%18%82%
2.62
3
Amy Bradley
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Susan Mazikowski
45W–81L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Wendy Vonnegut
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
0%90%10%
2.33
Jillian Ballantyne
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joy Williams
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
LaJune Ray
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Winona Gee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.