Teams

JClarke (Pine Lake)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs MGriffey (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 SinglesOmar Punjabi vs Larry McCorkle6-1, 6-0
2022-04-21vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoss Painter / Omar Punjabi vs Jose Villafana / Steve Henkel6-2, 6-4
2022-04-14vs BSmith (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoss Painter / Omar Punjabi vs Adam Yabes / Norm Cook6-1, 6-4
2022-04-12vs BChriscoe (Southampton)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Chu / Darnaye Black vs Bo Chriscoe / Vince Quinn4-6, 6-7
2022-04-07vs MWaleski (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnthony Lasala / Darnaye Black vs Joel Turner / Frank Martin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNils Weldy / Omar Punjabi vs Rod Spence / Eric Tan1-6, 4-6
2022-03-24vs MDriscoll (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNils Weldy / Omar Punjabi vs Rod Hartley / Jeffrey Cato6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoss Painter / Darnaye Black vs Michael Driscoll / Bobby Mauney5-7, 3-6
2022-03-03vs MGriffey (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesOmar Punjabi / Nils Weldy vs Gordon Lowman / Amitabh Bhargava6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-24vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNils Weldy / Omar Punjabi vs Matthew Cantrell / Eric Martin6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jay Tiedeman
published 4.5
4.22
Omar Punjabi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.18
Anthony Lasala
published 4
4.08
Darnaye Black
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Peter Baker
published
3.91
Ross Painter
published
3.82
Joseph Clarke
published
3.73
Tim Chu
published
3.60
Jason Freeman
published
3.52
Fred Murchison
published 4
Bert Wilder
published
Patrick Keaton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Baker + Darnaye Black033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Tiedeman
49W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Omar Punjabi
66W–21L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4
Anthony Lasala
35W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
4.18
4.5
Darnaye Black
117W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
Peter Baker
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
Ross Painter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Joseph Clarke
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Tim Chu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Jason Freeman
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Fred Murchison
29W–36L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Bert Wilder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Keaton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.