Teams

Broome/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - TUE AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-19vs Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Jewell vs Cindy Knapp6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLynn Strevell / Lisa Link vs Trina Gilbert / Hollie Williams3-6, 0-6
2025-04-15vs Shalk/Villalta/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesSusan Lahey / Rebecca Sara Cook vs Cristin Roark / Ginger Childs3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDesiree Appleby vs Maria Schoonover0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinh Burnett / Bettina Moore vs Elita Shalkevich / Lauren Schmid2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristina Egan vs Theresa Lee2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Craft / Marcia Harris vs Bianca Soma / Christine Holz6-1, 6-4
2025-04-08vs Frame/Brown/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Michelle Palk vs Autumn Brown / Cassie Bourdon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Egan vs Jenny East2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Harris / Kristi Broome vs Katherine Layman / Jessica Winfree6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jewell vs Julie LaLance1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMissy Eisenhauer / Nina Tateuchi vs Beth Brown / Joan Arney6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - TUE AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Michelle Palk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Sunyoung Fitt
published
3.33
Missy Eisenhauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Bettina Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Rebecca Sara Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Christina Egan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Lynn Strevell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Susan Lahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kristi Broome
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Jewell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Nina Tateuchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Desiree Appleby
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Whitney Thompson
published
2.95
Jenifer King
published
2.87
Mary Craft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linh Burnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson6554% games+5.7% vs expected
Missy Eisenhauer + Nina Tateuchi4256% games+2.7% vs expected
Susan Lahey + Rebecca Sara Cook1544% games+0.1% vs expected
Michelle Palk + Desiree Appleby1442% games−11.5% vs expected
Sunyoung Fitt + Susan Lahey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Palk
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Sunyoung Fitt
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Missy Eisenhauer
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Bettina Moore
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Rebecca Sara Cook
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christina Egan
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynn Strevell
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Lahey
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristi Broome
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Jewell
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Nina Tateuchi
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Desiree Appleby
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Whitney Thompson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Jenifer King
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Mary Craft
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Linh Burnett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.