← Teams

WHRC-Dale/Charlton

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Heather MacPherson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Heather Dale
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2019-06-30Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesHeather MacPherson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTonya Mahler / Heather Dale vs Carol Glenn / Rhea Thornburg6-1, 6-1
2019-06-22Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesHeather MacPherson vs Jaya Bilakanti6-1, 6-0
2019-06-15Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesHeather MacPherson vs Patricia Kuchar6-0, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Dale / Karen Tassinari vs Jennifer Gwin / Geri Marcus6-2, 6-3
2019-06-02Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Tassinari / Heather Dale vs Amie Edberg / Kirsten Humber7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather MacPherson / Kamila Vagnerova vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-05-19Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesHeather MacPherson vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman7-6, 6-2
2019-04-26Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesHeather MacPherson vs Barbara Gram6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRyoko Kitajima / Heather Dale vs Angela Winter / Suzanne Puttman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather MacPherson
64W–35L career
0%71%29%
3.54
3
Heather Dale
94W–94L career
0%89%11%
2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.