← Teams

TLTC Schacht

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Christopher Kradjan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
James Schacht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results4 ties
2018-11-25Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Kradjan / Anthony WITECKI vs Marc Medeiros / Michael Taft6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Russ Heaton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-11-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKurt Neff / Christopher Kradjan vs George Gonzalez / Tim Ohara6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Brady Miller vs Michael Okoro / Michael Kendall6-2, 6-2
2018-10-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Michael Hall vs Paul Groven / Robert Peters5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2018-09-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChristopher Kradjan / Dave Peterson vs Marc Medeiros / John Wheeler6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christopher Kradjan
127W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.03
3
James Schacht
42W–67L career
5%91%5%
2.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.