Teams

Snyder40/Knoxville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-08vs Keck 40+/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesBryce Curry / Norman Lea vs David Harano / Curtis DeFord1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJacob Gonzalez / Jesse Lunsford vs Edmon Begoli / Jeff Pewitt0-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs Keck 40+/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNorman Lea / Asad Malik vs David Harano / Rob Lucas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWade Shrivalle / Hunter Arritt vs Curtis DeFord / Rob Bray1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJesse Lunsford / Jacob Gonzalez vs Jeff Pewitt / Thomas Flores2-6, 0-6
2025-01-25vs Keck 40+/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNorman Lea / Asad Malik vs David Harano / Rob Lucas3-5
L#2 DoublesHunter Arritt / Stephen Smith vs Kevin Keck / Curtis DeFord4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJacob Gonzalez / Burke Arthur vs Thomas Shirley / Edmon Begoli1-6, 1-6
2025-01-18vs Keck 40+/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNorman Lea / Bryce Curry vs Rob Lucas / Curtis DeFord6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHunter Arritt / Stephen Smith vs Rob Bray / Stephen Wills6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJesse Lunsford / Scott Krummen vs Thomas Flores / Thomas Shirley0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Keck 40+/Knoxville31102555
2Snyder40/Knoxville1321020128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Bryce Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Asad Malik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Hunter Arritt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Isabelle Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Wade Shrivalle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Scott Krummen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Burke Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jesse Lunsford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Norman Lea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryce Curry
34W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Asad Malik
26W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Hunter Arritt
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Isabelle Snyder
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wade Shrivalle
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Scott Krummen
11W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Burke Arthur
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%66%34%
2.45
Jesse Lunsford
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norman Lea
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.