Teams

Winter (ARSC) 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 2.5 Women Fall Singles

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-21vs Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Singh vs Lyndsey Grubb6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Susan Barnes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Janice Wuebker6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Singh vs Helen Skeen7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Lauren Breedlove6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAllison Winters vs Mikayla Gilbert6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAllison Winters vs Annette Bagnoli6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Allison Sharpe6-0, 6-4
2025-10-05vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Katlyn Staub0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAllison Winters vs Tia Opyd6-2, 6-1
2025-09-23vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Demetria Simpson4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Cassandra Thompson4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Winters vs Caroline Jackson6-0, 6-0
2025-09-16vs Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Meredith Lantz2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKaitlin Singh vs Janice Wuebker6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAllison Winters vs Tamenika Delgado6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Mikayla Gilbert6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Helen Skeen1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Winters vs Kari Faulkner6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Annette Bagnoli6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Allison Chisholm7-6, 6-1
2025-08-26vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bly vs Erica Harden6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Allyson Wood6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-19vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllison Winters vs Demetria Simpson6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKaitlin Singh vs Carrie Hanger2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesMary Catherine Hartley vs Heather Barber6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Allison Winters
usually #3 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.36
Mary Catherine Hartley
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.27
Kaitlin Singh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Kimberly Bly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Allison Winters
8W–2L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Mary Catherine Hartley
11W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Kaitlin Singh
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Kimberly Bly
3W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.