29 Burkwood Butterworth 7.0
2026 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA
Schedule10 played
i
Flight standings30 teams · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 CCV Henry | 10 | 0 | 10 | 170 |
| 220 Westwood Tennis the Menace - Seredni | 8 | 2 | 21 | 251 |
| 312 Burkwood-Colgin | 8 | 2 | 25 | 224 |
| 41 HCC-Yablonski | 8 | 2 | 27 | 235 |
| 526 MAC Machine - Jepson | 8 | 2 | 27 | 258 |
| 615 MTC Yarabe | 7 | 3 | 34 | 271 |
| 719 Westwood - Racelis | 6 | 4 | 28 | 275 |
| 85 Westwood Bad Bunnies - Carlin | 6 | 4 | 29 | 261 |
| 96 Raintree Begin 7.0 | 6 | 4 | 35 | 288 |
| 1018 Hermitage Blankley | 5 | 4 | 25 | 235 |
| 112 ACAC Lewis/Pfeiffer | 5 | 4 | 26 | 241 |
| 128 ACAC Dickens | 5 | 5 | 26 | 226 |
| 134 ACAC Jones 7.0 mixed | 5 | 5 | 29 | 259 |
| 1422 Raintree Bryan | 5 | 5 | 29 | 276 |
| 1513 MAC-White 7.0 | 5 | 5 | 31 | 283 |
| 1627 Willow Oaks - Stalls | 5 | 5 | 31 | 262 |
| 1721 SCC Lane | 5 | 5 | 32 | 277 |
| 1811 WW - Harker/Yuen | 5 | 5 | 32 | 272 |
| 1923 Haas 7.0 WOCC | 5 | 5 | 33 | 279 |
| 207 Acac Davis Double the Fun | 5 | 5 | 34 | 267 |
| 213 SCC Means | 5 | 5 | 35 | 289 |
| 2210 CSW Ghita | 5 | 5 | 36 | 283 |
| 2325 MTC Miracles - Marks | 3 | 7 | 39 | 288 |
| 2417 ACAC Krebs | 3 | 7 | 39 | 306 |
| 2528 MAC Talamo | 3 | 7 | 39 | 306 |
| 2624 WOCC Mullinax 7.0 | 3 | 7 | 40 | 295 |
| 2716 ACAC Larue | 3 | 7 | 41 | 313 |
| 2830 VCU/MRTC Mixed CMH - Hawley | 1 | 9 | 43 | 305 |
| 2929 Burkwood Butterworth 7.0 | 1 | 9 | 50 | 323 |
| 3014 Raintree Hayes-Dolghiu Mixed | 0 | 10 | 53 | 335 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Virginia Bowie + Ken Allen | 2–3 | 44% games | not enough data |
| Jackson Ames + Frances Poehler | 1–4 | 48% games | not enough data |
| David Flanagan + Barbara Flanagan | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| David Ames + Ellen Bedichek | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.