Teams

Jo.Hastings18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-30vs Jo.Hollingsworth18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrooks Lowe vs Joseph Hollingsworth2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmir Lyall vs Taylor Atherton4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJeremy Bales vs Hanzhang Liu6-2, 6-0
2026-06-23vs De.Byrd18S3.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesLandon White vs Nick Strope5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeremy Bales vs Deraymes Harris4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJoshua Limon vs Eric Emmanuel0-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs Mi.Ratliff18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesJeremy Bales vs Mark Wood7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLandon White vs David Testa5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWilliam Slocum vs Matthew Smith6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs Jo.Hollingsworth18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmir Lyall vs Joseph Hollingsworth3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBrooks Lowe vs Sheldon Roberts3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLandon White vs Hanzhang Liu6-0, 6-2
2026-05-19vs De.Byrd18S3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesJeremy Bales vs Paul Sherman6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrooks Lowe vs Clay Fussell6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJoshua Limon vs Eric Emmanuel4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jo.Hollingsworth18S6215919173
2De.Byrd18S3.55315923195
3Jo.Hastings18S237819134
4Pa.Vickers18S3.52471125182
5Mi.Ratliff18S2571431213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Amir Lyall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jeremy Bales
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.35
Brooks Lowe
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
William Slocum
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Josh Hastings
published
3.19
Landon White
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Joshua Limon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.06
Clay Parker
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
3.04
Thomas Albertson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Slocum + Thomas Albertson3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amir Lyall
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jeremy Bales
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Brooks Lowe
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
William Slocum
54W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Josh Hastings
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Landon White
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Joshua Limon
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Clay Parker
25W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Thomas Albertson
49W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.