Teams

Wykoff 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-15vs Yates 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexa Smith / Robin Crosier vs Kim Kyle / Meghan Flynn5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Shigo / Catherine Martin vs Shannon Roley / Jane Forbes Fields6-2, 7-5
2025-09-17vs Siesling 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirsten Bertschi / Allison Aldridge vs Karen Hardesty / Sharlotte Brooks2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Dulin / Aimee Largen vs Amber Siesling / Margaret Beck1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Shigo / Susan Rogers vs Alyssa Way / Bridget Cornwall6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAllison Aldridge / Michele Shigo vs Ginger Ballard / Brandi Jacques0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCatherine Martin / Tesha Whaley vs Deirdre Hjelt / Cameron Wannamaker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChrista Wykoff / Ann Hartley vs Tracey Grayzer / Erin Cockman4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMichele Shigo / Catherine Martin vs Julie McPherson / Diane Puckett6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHayes Mills / Alexa Smith vs Jennifer Klein / Kathryn Roberts6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Crosier / Susan Rogers vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams / Louise Cox1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesChrista Wykoff / Catherine Martin vs Thais Warwar / Stephanie Oudinot6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Hartley / Robin Crosier vs Rebekah East / Michelle Swinyer4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichele Shigo / Aimee Largen vs Ashley Jones / Elizabeth Jones0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Christa Wykoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Tesha Whaley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Michele Shigo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.17
Robin Crosier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Kirsten Bertschi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Hayes Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Catherine Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Lara Heberle
published
2.89
Susan Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Amy Dulin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Allison Aldridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Ann Hartley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Aimee Largen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lisa Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Wykoff + Michele Shigo6164% games+6.0% vs expected
Lara Heberle + Amy Dulin2345% games−7.3% vs expected
Robin Crosier + Amy Dulin1448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Crosier + Christa Wykoff134 matchesnot enough data
Robin Crosier + Michele Shigo123 matchesnot enough data
Robin Crosier + Ann Hartley123 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Largen + Amy Dulin033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Aldridge + Alexa Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christa Wykoff
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Tesha Whaley
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Michele Shigo
21W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Robin Crosier
17W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kirsten Bertschi
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Hayes Mills
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Lara Heberle
27W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Susan Rogers
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amy Dulin
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Ann Hartley
9W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Aimee Largen
15W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.