Teams

SBTC - Lemon Drops

Adult 40 & Over - SB Summer 2021 · SB - Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-07-18vs LCCC - Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Story / Jill Sagner vs Felisa Manion / Lauren Katz6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLacy Selby vs Lauren Brennan6-3, 6-1
2021-07-11vs SB-LLW-Cosmos-Jaclyn ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Guardino / Lacy Selby vs Jennifer Wolt / Molly Diener2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Jill Sagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Caryn Garrett
published 3.5
3.34
Katherine Fabbre
published 3.5
3.33
Anne Mitchell
published 3.5
3.31
Lacy Selby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Serena Weddle
published
Carol Tricase
published 3.5
3.24
Camilla Thompson
published 3.5
3.22
Kristina Holdren
published
3.22
Nicole Halabisky
published
3.07
Karen Guardino
published 3.5
3.06
Lisa MacHado
published
3.02
Shirley Sanematsu
published
2.93
Linda Ullman
published
2.85
Donna Jolley
published 3
Barbara Jelks
published
Kristin Story
published
Tracey Peterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caryn Garrett + Tracey Peterson5263% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristina Holdren + Caryn Garrett3251% games−4.4% vs expected
Kristina Holdren + Serena Weddle1840% games−9.4% vs expected
Caryn Garrett + Anne Mitchell3249% gamesnot enough data
Lisa MacHado + Kristin Story314 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Halabisky + Serena Weddle314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Ullman + Serena Weddle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Sagner
43W–41L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Caryn Garrett
19W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Katherine Fabbre
71W–74L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Anne Mitchell
33W–28L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Lacy Selby
50W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
Serena Weddle
19W–16L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carol Tricase
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Camilla Thompson
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Kristina Holdren
18W–28L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Nicole Halabisky
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Karen Guardino
11W–29L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Lisa MacHado
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Shirley Sanematsu
3W–13L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.02
Linda Ullman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Donna Jolley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
2.85
Barbara Jelks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Story
24W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Peterson
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.