Teams

Rhody/Knoxville

2026 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 2.5 Women Combo Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 18 6:00 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 20 4:30 PM
vs N/A
Angela Rae Rhody
Sep 25 6:00 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 27 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Oct 4 4:30 PM
vs N/A
Angela Rae Rhody
2026-08-30vs Waide/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Goodman / Renee Trent vs Jamie Iverson / LeAnn Waide7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChasity O'Quinn / Rhonda Mann vs Kim Huinker / Meg Stratton4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWindsor Wall / Angela Rae Rhody vs Carolyn Smith / Alyssa Maddox6-2, 6-2
2026-08-25vs TiptonMendoza/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Mann / Jackie Hone vs Jennifer Mendoza / Cheri Arnsdorff2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Trent / Lauren Goodman vs Ashley Tipton / Paula Cutter0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Rae Rhody / Windsor Wall vs Wyeshia Edwards / Dana Gibson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-22vs Waide/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Rae Rhody / Windsor Wall vs Carolyn Smith / Meg Stratton6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJodi St Charles / Fallon Parker Hutcheon vs Kim Huinker / Alyssa Maddox6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackie Hone / Chasity O'Quinn vs LeAnn Waide / Alaina Smith0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rhody/Knoxville000000
2Waide/Knoxville000000
3TiptonMendoza/Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Jodi St Charles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Angela Rae Rhody
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.37
Windsor Wall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Martha Filipkowski
published
2.16
Jackie Hone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Rhonda Mann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Lauren Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.97
Chasity O'Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Fallon Parker Hutcheon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Mann + Jodi St Charles3446% gamesnot enough data
Angela Rae Rhody + Windsor Wall303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodi St Charles
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
2.5
Angela Rae Rhody
12W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Windsor Wall
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Martha Filipkowski
14W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Jackie Hone
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Rhonda Mann
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Lauren Goodman
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Chasity O'Quinn
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Fallon Parker Hutcheon
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.