Teams

LJEP-Epler/CSD

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 4.0 Wed-Sat

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-08vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Robson / Bill Parrish vs Bradley Bolick / Jonathan Hole6-2, 6-0
2023-04-29vs LJBA-Banner/PeninsulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Robson / Jeremy Cowper vs Alfu Miah / Charles Zylstra6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBill Parrish / Tom May vs Alan Rummelsburg / Greg Mullet6-1, 6-2
2023-04-06vs LRCA-Caballero-NMP40Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeremy Cowper / Frederick Armstrong vs Roberto Caballero / John Igharas2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Armstrong / Bill Parrish vs Marc Roberge / Trenton Parker6-1, 6-2
2023-04-05vs LDBaker/NMP 4.0 WedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Epler / Brian Cudney vs Nate Roller / Arnaud Couturier3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBill Parrish / Tom May vs Sreejith Sreedharan / Dewey Baker5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-02vs LJDO-DoyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Epler / Todd Armstrong vs Paul McCann / Jeff Cline7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-11vs LKHaynes-WP/CSDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeremy Cowper / Mark Robson vs Thomas Andrews / Scott Nestor6-2, 7-6
2023-03-08vs LJBA-Banner/PeninsulaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Cudney / James Epler vs Bill Moore / Brett Scherrman6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKarthik Shanmugam / Bill Parrish vs James Banner / Charles Zylstra3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 Wed-Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jeremy Cowper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Bill Parrish
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Mark Robson
published
3.74
James Epler
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Brian Cudney
published 4
3.68
Todd Armstrong
published
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
published
3.68
Karthik Shanmugam
published
Todd Brandon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Cowper + Mark Robson4172% games+6.4% vs expected
Jeremy Cowper + James Epler4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeremy Cowper
115W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Bill Parrish
69W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Mark Robson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
James Epler
67W–70L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Brian Cudney
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Todd Armstrong
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Karthik Shanmugam
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Todd Brandon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.