Teams

HCC Lines

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / AIMEE DABNEY vs Karen Ivie / Tara Mezzenga6-0, 6-4
2021-06-21vs TDC WoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Carrie Boyd vs Kerry Whitacre / Catherine McPherson6-0, 6-0
2021-05-28vs Westwood Caudill / SeredniLost 01
L#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Cara Patterson vs Carlyle Walek / Jenny Sharrar6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-05-24vs Salisbury TillerWon 10
W#1 SinglesAMY LINES vs Colleen Weisiger6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
2.92
Cara Patterson
published 3
2.68
AIMEE DABNEY
published 3
2.68
Alexia Gerczak
published 3
2.67
Kristen Wood
published
2.66
Jennifer McGeorge
published
2.23
Beth Stuckey
published 2.5
Stephanie Painter
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Cara Patterson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
AIMEE DABNEY
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kristen Wood
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer McGeorge
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Beth Stuckey
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.23
Stephanie Painter
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.