Teams

KY/OWB/CASTLEN

ADULT 40 & OVER · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-26vs KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle 40+Won 31
W#1 DoublesLeigh Castlen / Lisa Sullivan vs Heather Gardner / Nicole Newland6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNancy Wells vs Angela Martin2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacie Moyers / Linda Richeson vs Anna Greene / Jennifer Ploetz6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrooks Smith / Hadley Wilson vs Kam Liu / Gayle Markwell6-1, 6-0
2026-04-25vs KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle 40+Won 31
W#1 DoublesKim Boarman / Nancy Wells vs Stacy Lambert / Rebecca Winsett6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeigh Castlen vs Angela Martin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWhitney Foreman / Lisa Sullivan vs Anna Greene / Stella Heichelbech6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrooks Smith / Hadley Wilson vs Kam Liu / Gayle Markwell6-7, 6-7
2026-04-24vs KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Boarman / Nancy Wells vs Stacy Lambert / Rebecca Winsett6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesStacie Moyers / Linda Richeson vs Nicole Newland / Jennifer Ploetz3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Foreman / Brooks Smith vs Heather Gardner / Stella Heichelbech6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/OWB/CASTLEN3084881
2KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle 40+034816126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Stacie Moyers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Leigh Castlen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.34
Whitney Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Linda Richeson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kim Boarman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Nancy Wells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.11
Hadley Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Boarman + Nancy Wells4449% games−3.0% vs expected
Linda Richeson + Stacie Moyers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacie Moyers
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Leigh Castlen
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Whitney Foreman
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Linda Richeson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Kim Boarman
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Nancy Wells
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Hadley Wilson
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.