Teams

WW-Coleman

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Baker / Sarah Oatts vs Reese Puckett / Sharon Harless6-2, 6-0
2022-03-05vs RAIN-EarleLost 01
L#2 DoublesKory Painter / Sarah Oatts vs Gary Wills / Lila LaCroix7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs ACAC-LarueSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Jeremiah Brown vs Denise Weisberg / Nathan Arland7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Baker / Sarah Oatts vs Craik Goodspeed / Robin Petrine7-5, 6-1
2022-01-23vs MAC-HuangLost 01
L#3 DoublesRyan Baker / Jennifer White vs Kevin Cousins / Laurie Malheiros2-6, 3-6
2022-01-15vs MAC-WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesDutch Jones / Sarah Oatts vs Jeffrey Johnson / Bernice White6-1, 6-3
2022-01-08vs BURK-MatthewsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRyan Baker / Sarah Oatts vs Blake Goldsmith / Craig Matthews3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Jeremiah Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
3.93
Sarah Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Kory Painter
published
3.74
Jeremiah Brown
published
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
3.62
Dutch Jones
published 4
3.55
Walker Reid
published
3.51
Ashley Wright Henry
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Meagan Mihalko
published
3.35
Jennifer White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Harry Turton
published 3.5
Brandon Covey
published 3.5
3.25
Frank Payne
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Dutch Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Sarah Oatts
81W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Kory Painter
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
Jeremiah Brown
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Dutch Jones
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Walker Reid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Meagan Mihalko
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jennifer White
104W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Brandon Covey
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Frank Payne
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.