Teams

Cedar Sprint

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-07vs 40 LOVELost 01
L#1 SinglesGaby Neven vs Elizabeth Solander4-6, 4-3
2024-08-25vs 40 LOVESplit 11
L#1 SinglesCheryl Risell vs Margarita Baldwin4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCameron Craig vs Jemine Bryon6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-17vs 40 LOVESplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Laudiero vs Elizabeth Solander6-4, 3-2
L#2 SinglesCameron Craig vs Shadana Myers5-7, 3-4
2024-08-03vs 40 LOVELost 02
L#1 SinglesCheryl Risell vs Elizabeth Solander5-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJasmine Mason vs Jemine Bryon2-6, 1-3
2024-07-27vs 40 LOVELost 01
L#1 SinglesAnna Laudiero vs Jemine Bryon2-6, 5-2
2024-07-21vs 40 LOVESplit 11
L#2 SinglesJasmine Mason vs Ariel Selwyn3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJessica Lai vs Sabrina Leguizamon7-5, 6-1
2024-07-20vs 40 LOVEWon 10
W#1 SinglesGaby Neven vs Shadana Myers6-4, 2-3
2024-07-07vs 40 LOVELost 03
L#1 SinglesAnna Laudiero vs Angel Amponsah4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Lai vs Shadana Myers2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesGaby Neven vs Elizabeth Solander5-7, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jasmine Mason
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.92
Anna Laudiero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Cameron Craig
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Jessica Lai
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Cheryl Risell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
Katherine Bowles
published
3.57
Matthew Holubecki
published
Gaby Neven
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Craig + Jessica Lai3258% games−0.6% vs expected
Jessica Lai + Anna Laudiero314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jasmine Mason
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Anna Laudiero
46W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Cameron Craig
44W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Jessica Lai
76W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Cheryl Risell
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Bowles
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Matthew Holubecki
52W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
Gaby Neven
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.