Teams

VBTC - Rogers

2024 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-19vs Irmsl/DiLallo/18&OverCombo7.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesKirby Tucker / Edgar Botero vs Michael Owen / Thomas Cosgrove6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Lopez / Donald Spaeth vs Kevin DiLallo / Colton Morrish3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Wade / Nathan Burkett-Cadena vs Steven Froggatt / Adam Horvit3-6, 1-6
2024-11-14vs Irmsl/DiLallo/18&OverCombo7.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirby Tucker / Edgar Botero vs Steven Froggatt / Colton Morrish6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonald Spaeth / Adil Omar vs Michael Owen / Adam Horvit6-2
W#3 DoublesBryan Wade / Nathan Burkett-Cadena vs Clyde Price / Robert Coover6-3, 6-2
2024-10-22vs Irmsl/DiLallo/18&OverCombo7.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdgar Botero / Kirby Tucker vs Felipe Wells / Adam Horvit6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlex Lopez / Bryan Wade vs Robert Coover / Thomas Cosgrove6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonald Spaeth / Nathan Burkett-Cadena vs Steven Froggatt / Walter Scherer6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Donald Spaeth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Edgar Botero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Adil Omar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Nathan Burkett-Cadena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Kirby Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Bradley Rogers
published 3.5
Bryan Wade
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Mark Rodolico
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Spaeth + Nathan Burkett-Cadena123 matchesnot enough data
Kirby Tucker + Edgar Botero303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donald Spaeth
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Edgar Botero
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Adil Omar
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Nathan Burkett-Cadena
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Kirby Tucker
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bradley Rogers
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Bryan Wade
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Rodolico
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.