Teams

Huffhines/Williams-Pingleton W3.0F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

13 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-04vs The Lakes TA/Falke W3.0FWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Usie / Leslie Loyd vs Sharon Bruley / Salina Johnson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAbbey Pardue / Jessica Williams vs Karen Kim / Susan Johnson6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Griffin / Stacey Rathbun vs Artee Vedula / Kim Mundorff3-6, 2-6
2025-10-31vs Samuell Grand/Mallory W3.0FLost 04
L#1 DoublesShelley Pingelton / Susan Deloach vs Niki Leete / Carol Perry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErika Usie vs Melissa Trosclair3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Baker / Kellie Davis vs Kristin Mallory / Jessica Vonbargen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Kelly / Marcie Durst vs Tamara Woodchek / Corey Martindale2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesAbbey Pardue / Erika Usie vs Becky Tillman / Holly Saunders3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShelley Pingelton vs Jennifer Flock6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Douthit / Stacey Rathbun vs Tabetha Motes / Shiloah Ohrvall2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKellie Davis / Stacey Reinig vs Patricia Hugley / Morgan Rettke1-6, 0-6
2025-10-10vs DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.0FLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Loyd / Shelley Pingelton vs Caitlin Berg / Carolyn Sexton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Enns vs Tara Versfelt2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Williams / Susan Deloach vs Claire Phillips / Cynthia Amstein0-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs McKinney/Bearden-Belle-Isle W3.0FLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Pingelton / Abbey Pardue vs Laura Pavelka / Amy Russo1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Baker / Marcie Durst vs Kelley McCall / Jennifer Archer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKellie Davis / Ashley Kelly vs Lara Belle-Isle / Leslie Newman2-6, 2-6
2025-09-19vs The Nelson/Galjour W3.0FLost 13
W#1 DoublesLeslie Loyd / Susan Deloach vs Allison Rodriguez / Cynthia Cheek3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbbey Pardue vs Lorena Noguera Rivello5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Douthit / Stacey Rathbun vs Kim Brown / Kristi Stacy1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarcie Durst / Amy Enns vs Carolyn Puklicz / Alyssa Roelke0-6, 0-6
2025-09-12vs Gleneagles/Anderson-Shores W3.0FLost 13
W#1 DoublesShelley Pingelton / Susan Deloach vs Barbara Hunt / Kayla Ellingson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDana Douthit vs Sara Coyle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAbbey Pardue / Jessica Williams vs Erica Tuscano / LORI BOEDING1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Kelly / Stacey Rathbun vs Emily Chapman / Kelly Stevens5-7, 4-6
2025-09-05vs High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0FLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeslie Loyd / Susan Deloach vs Sherre Barton / Irene Weaver5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarcie Durst vs Kristen Fenner1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Williams / Shelley Pingelton vs Darla Searles / Jaclyn Whisenant6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly Griffin / Kellie Davis vs Jennifer Parr / SHIRL MCKINNEY1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Erika Usie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Shelley Pingelton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Catherine Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Leslie Loyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Susan Deloach
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.40
Abbey Pardue
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.28
Amy Enns
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Dana Douthit
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Kellie Davis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marcie Durst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Stacey Rathbun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Reinig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Soignier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Deloach + Leslie Loyd2445% games+7.3% vs expected
Shelley Pingelton + Erika Usie303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erika Usie
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Shelley Pingelton
14W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Catherine Baker
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Loyd
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Susan Deloach
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Abbey Pardue
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Amy Enns
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Dana Douthit
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Kellie Davis
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcie Durst
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Rathbun
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Reinig
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tiffany Soignier
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.