Teams

CSRC POULIN

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-12vs CCOC BOOKLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Blackwell / Jinda Booth vs Emilie Rudolph / Melissa Jamison5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Newton / Judy Custine vs Irene Larimer / Crista Clancy6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNoel Kelly / Deborah Link vs Jan Hyman / Johane Aertker0-6, 4-6
2026-06-05vs MEMPK SHAINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Young / Christine Blackwell vs Vicki Gess / Dana Kennedy2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Poulin / Karen Newton vs Susan Shaink / Jane Glimco0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNoel Kelly / Jinda Booth vs Ann Skarban / Judi Ashmen2-6, 1-6
2026-05-29vs CSCC SEIBERTLost 03
L#1 DoublesJinda Booth / Judy Custine vs Julie Davis / Kari Leach3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Poulin / Noel Kelly vs Kathryn Seibert / Carol Pepper6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Young / Deborah Link vs Michele Noonan / Kayla Walker4-6, 4-6
2026-05-15vs MEMPK DIMBERIOWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Blackwell / Karen Newton vs Tricia Hester / Teresa Vieira5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Young / Patricia Poulin vs Denny Elston / Janet Mulvaney6-2, 6-3
2026-05-08vs CCOC BOOKLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Poulin / Karen Newton vs Emilie Rudolph / Kelly Sung4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Beadles / Jinda Booth vs Suzanne Book / Irene Larimer7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Link / Judy Custine vs Deborah Dodd / Ellen Schwinger1-6, 4-6
2026-05-01vs MEMPK SHAINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Newton / Christine Blackwell vs Judi Ashmen / Jane Glimco6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatricia Poulin / Carol Young vs Susan Shaink / Lisa Ostly6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJinda Booth / Christine Beadles vs Karen Schaller / Myrene Conner2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Jinda Booth
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Karen Newton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Christine Beadles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Christine Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Carol Young
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Patricia Poulin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Judy Custine
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Noel Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Deborah Link
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Poulin + Noel Kelly3251% games+0.3% vs expected
Karen Newton + Christine Blackwell2349% games−6.3% vs expected
Jinda Booth + Noel Kelly224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Young + Karen Newton033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Newton + Judy Custine213 matchesnot enough data
Jinda Booth + Judy Custine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jinda Booth
26W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Karen Newton
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Christine Beadles
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christine Blackwell
3W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Carol Young
5W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Patricia Poulin
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Judy Custine
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Noel Kelly
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Deborah Link
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.