Teams

McFarlin 40s 3.0M Wed PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 3.0 40 & Over Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-23vs Swinyer/Fuquay 40s 3.0M Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRob Ysidron / DAREN BARNES vs Kevin Kemp / Alec Gill6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Davis / Saroj Patnaik vs Ralph Jones / Steve Billings6-3, 6-3
2025-04-09vs McIntyre 40s 3.0M Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGarland Hilliard / John Heberle vs Felipe Gonzalez / Diego Waegeli0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSaroj Patnaik / Ben Sumner vs Devin White / James McIntyre6-3, 7-6
2025-04-02vs Mendoza 40s 3.0M Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGarland Hilliard / William Davis vs Richard Donoghue / MIKAEL SCHILL6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDAREN BARNES / Eric McFarlin vs Rick Williamson / Kevin McKnight6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
DAREN BARNES
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Garland Hilliard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Dan Horan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Eric McFarlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Ben Sumner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Rob Ysidron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Saroj Patnaik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Edward Mulvey
published
John Heberle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garland Hilliard + Eric McFarlin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
DAREN BARNES
29W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Garland Hilliard
40W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Dan Horan
29W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Eric McFarlin
32W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Ben Sumner
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Rob Ysidron
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Saroj Patnaik
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Edward Mulvey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Heberle
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.