Teams

M18-4.0-Arecibo C.Club-Hector Macias

Adult 18 & Over 2021 · 2021 18 & Over Mens 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesHeriberto Caldero / Joaquin Quinoy vs German Acevedo / Nelson Mejias-Diaz6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Juan Santillan7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Marcos Diaz5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeriberto Caldero / Joaquin Quinoy vs Carlos Cordova / Gabriel Feliu4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Wesley Maldonado2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHeriberto Caldero / Joaquin Quinoy vs Juan Santillan / Miguel Soto6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesHector MacIas / Heriberto Caldero vs Jorge Gesualdo / Eduardo Cortes1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Miguel A Perez Ortiz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Marcos Diaz2-6, 3-6
2021-08-08vs M18-4.0-Palmas-Josean DelgadoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeriberto Caldero / Joaquin Quinoy vs Julian Rivera / Jose Bonilla6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Diego Storer Corrada6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-01vs M18-4.0-Palmas-Josean DelgadoWon 10
W#1 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Kevin Vazquez6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJoaquin Quinoy / Heriberto Caldero vs Rinaldo Robles / Derick Rivera Sanguinetti6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesOscar Ramon Cruz vs Mauricio Cabrera7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2021 18 & Over Mens 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Heriberto Caldero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Edwin Diaz
published 4
3.75
Marcos Velez-Green
published
3.67
Hector MacIas
published 4
3.67
Joaquin Quinoy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Oscar Ramon Cruz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.07
Andres Munoz
published 4
Jose Nieto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heriberto Caldero + Joaquin Quinoy9261% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heriberto Caldero
102W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Christian Afanador
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Edwin Diaz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcos Velez-Green
38W–22L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Hector MacIas
12W–27L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Joaquin Quinoy
107W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Oscar Ramon Cruz
58W–54L career · 8 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Andres Munoz
14W–20L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
Jose Nieto
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.