Teams

Jeansonne/40/MXD/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesShelly Fielder / Michael McGill vs Bryan Armstrong / Caroline Jeter6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDebbie Angelo / Thaddaeus Wallace vs Greg Phillips / Kimberly Arizmendi7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTammy Rhodes / Mark Bissell vs Troy Adkins / Crystal Dupuy6-4, 6-2
2025-05-15vs Mitchell-Armstrong/40/3.0/MXD/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Brown / Becky Crain vs Bryan Armstrong / Brittany Mitchell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Bissell / Debbie Angelo vs Greg Wellman / KELLY TOUPS6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Doles / Tammy Rhodes vs Greg Phillips / Lynette Campisi3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Mark Bissell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Michael Hudson
published
3.05
Elaine Gilbert
published
2.95
Thaddaeus Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Michael McGill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Becky Crain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Shelly Fielder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tammy Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Susan Torma
published
2.74
Kelly Clayton
published
2.72
Michael Doles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Debbie Angelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Chris Sampite
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Marijane Jeansonne
published
Rusty Gilbert
published
Shinyoung You
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hudson + Shelly Fielder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Bissell
18W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Michael Hudson
18W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Elaine Gilbert
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Thaddaeus Wallace
32W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Michael McGill
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Becky Crain
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Shelly Fielder
39W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Tammy Rhodes
26W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Susan Torma
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Charlie Euichol Ha
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Clayton
20W–26L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Michael Doles
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Debbie Angelo
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Chris Sampite
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Marijane Jeansonne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Rusty Gilbert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shinyoung You
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.