Teams

M.Then

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-10vs D.John 18 4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesMeghan Howard / Stacy Rank vs Monique Jiggetts / Pamela Hankerson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Gabrielle Shields vs Mary Marshall Easley / Ashley McRae6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-07vs A.KoltchagovaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeghan Howard / Stacy Rank vs Cynthia Jones / Cynthia Smith6-4, 6-1
2023-04-23vs L.Hatlen 18Won 10
W#3 DoublesStacy Rank / Judith Stewart vs Jocelyn Badulis / Joan Faulkner6-3, 7-5
2023-04-16vs C.HigginsLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Rank / Gabrielle Shields vs Claire Songkakul / Chunhui Higgins2-6, 3-6
2023-04-09vs L.KempfWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Lawn / Anneliese Carr vs Lisa Kempf / Heather Jayson6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Stacy Rank
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.85
Gabrielle Shields
published
3.77
Kathryn Lawn
published
3.73
Jessica Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.69
Lindsey Klein
published
3.68
Michelle Then
published
3.64
Heidi Ross
published
3.52
Nicole Bullock
published
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.14
Judith Stewart
published
Jordan Fieldstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Rank + Meghan Howard6162% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacy Rank
283W–91L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
Gabrielle Shields
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Kathryn Lawn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
Jessica Sherman
27W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Lindsey Klein
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Michelle Then
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Nicole Bullock
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Judith Stewart
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jordan Fieldstein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.