Teams

SGV LLW Heavy Hitters-St Clair-Arcadia/SA11

2025 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Men 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-29vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Lost 12
W#1 SinglesIan Kaufman vs Zhenqi Zhang6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMark Read vs Andy Zang6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTed Chi vs Kirby Xu3-6, 5-7
2025-03-23Won 30
W#1 SinglesFred Kao vs Eric Chang6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTim Green vs Nicholas Wang4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSammy Tse vs Daniel Wu6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesFred Kao vs Shunkou Kinoshita6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesIan Kaufman vs Riley Klarkowski6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTim Green vs Ted Randall6-4, 6-4
2025-02-22vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Won 21
W#1 SinglesFred Kao vs Kirby Xu6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTed Chi vs Changlin Wu6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAdante Harvey vs Xiao Zhang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-09Won 21
L#1 SinglesTim Green vs Andy Baker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAdante Harvey vs Eric Chang6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSammy Tse vs Nicholas Wang7-6, 4-3
W#1 SinglesFred Kao vs Christopher Taus6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChase Block vs Riley Klarkowski6-1, 6-3
2025-01-25vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Won 30
W#1 SinglesFred Kao vs Xiao Zhang6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSammy Tse vs Zhenqi Zhang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTed Chi vs Siyang Pei6-1, 6-4
2025-01-18vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SULost 03
L#1 SinglesTim Green vs Anthony Canapi5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChase Block vs Andy Baker5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSammy Tse vs TAREK BABA3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Neal St. Clair
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.90
Fred Kao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Tim Green
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Ian Kaufman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.78
Sammy Tse
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.77
Ted Chi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Adante Harvey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Chase Block
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Mark Read
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fred Kao + Tim Green4647% games+2.2% vs expected
Mark Read + Tim Green213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neal St. Clair
34W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3
Fred Kao
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tim Green
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Ian Kaufman
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Sammy Tse
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Ted Chi
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Adante Harvey
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chase Block
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Read
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.