Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Padilla

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesAida Padilla vs Victoria Pearce0-6, 0-6
2023-05-30vs SD 3.5 CTC/ Cays (2:3)/ SchmiedLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Enriquez / Tenley Gritts vs Maria Simon / Leslie Vineyard4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDafne Fitzmaurice Osuna / Aida Padilla vs Joan Fahrenthold / Heather Grimes1-6, 0-6
2023-05-23vs SD LLW 3.5 Coronado TC/ NicholsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrenda Villasenor / Tenley Gritts vs Jessica Cunningham / Ruth York5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-09vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ TrentSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlejandra Brizuela / Aida Padilla vs Katy Bendel Daniels / Lisa Gray7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Enriquez / Kristen Miller vs Debi Rose / Susan Schraeder1-6, 4-6
2023-05-02vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ GamaraLost 02
L#2 DoublesSylvia Devoe / Patricia Enriquez vs Carol Gamara / Alicia Burnes6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAida Padilla / Dafne Fitzmaurice Osuna vs Miller McCord / Sonia Peterson2-6, 5-7
2023-04-25vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ LouisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDafne Fitzmaurice Osuna / Aida Padilla vs Sarah Dudley / JACQUELINE SAENZ3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Villasenor / Alejandra Brizuela vs Elizabeth Ponce / Lilyan Ruiz6-4, 6-0
2023-04-11vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ MorganWon 10
W#1 DoublesEsmeralda Pena / Brenda Villasenor vs Herta Ixtlahuac / Kelly Morgan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brenda Villasenor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.64
Tenley Gritts
published
3.36
Nathalia Valles
published
3.24
Mer Chiodo
published
2.96
2.63
Patricia Enriquez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kristen Miller
published
Ruby Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aida Padilla + Tenley Gritts4249% gamesnot enough data
Aida Padilla + Patricia Enriquez033 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Enriquez + Brenda Villasenor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Villasenor
85W–49L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Tenley Gritts
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Nathalia Valles
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Patricia Enriquez
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
Kristen Miller
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruby Gardner
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.