Teams

Radillo (Ron Ehmann)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.41 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Michele Drucker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Gabriela Castanon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Bianca Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.12
Carin Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Maria Mustelier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Steffi Kordy
published
4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.06
Maria Hulett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
3.97
Miriam Radillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Marcela Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Joanne Carroll
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Lesley Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Christine Padron
published 4
Leyvis Concepcion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carin Blanchard + Michele Drucker6263% games+14.2% vs expected
Gricel Boto Bernales + Bianca Alvarez5554% games+7.4% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Janine Burke71052% games+5.7% vs expected
Bianca Alvarez + Michele Drucker4452% games+4.3% vs expected
Miriam Radillo + Gabriela Castanon151455% games+2.1% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Maria Hulett684456% games+1.6% vs expected
Joanne Carroll + Janine Burke7744% games+0.3% vs expected
Miriam Radillo + Bianca Alvarez7851% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Drucker
94W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Gabriela Castanon
255W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Carin Blanchard
206W–149L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Maria Mustelier
47W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Steffi Kordy
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–259L career · 6 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Alison McLaughlin
37W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
4.5
Miriam Radillo
87W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Marcela Schwartz
39W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.96
Joanne Carroll
44W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.94
Lesley Harrington
42W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Christine Padron
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Leyvis Concepcion
66W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.