Teams

YTC-Skull and Crossrackets

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 2.94 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-22vs IND-Cross Court CrewWon 32
L#1 DoublesSarah Michael / Jacqueline Degrasse vs Heather Pina / Rasa Morris2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Vold vs Stefanie Hunsaker6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJessica Rottweiler / Bri Plath vs Rose Longoria / Mandy Manning6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPamela Urquhart vs Jessica Johnson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Terami / Erika Mullins vs Deborah Wardwell / Suzanne Griffin-Lawson1-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs CBRC-RacqueteersWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Vold / Bri Plath vs Ord McConaghy / ARLENE CUSTER6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Terami vs Molly Cragin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Rottweiler / Valerie Hull vs Heidi Bucheli / Lory Allen6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPamela Urquhart vs Rachael Linson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKellye Richelderfer / Erika Mullins vs Marlen Castellanos / Mikayla Beckley4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-21vs IND-Scrambled SetsWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Terami / Erika Mullins vs Linda Mauws / Traci Pomrankey6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLisa Vold vs Anne Neuberger6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Christianson / Valerie Hull vs Salem Gray / Dragana Vrcelj-Nikolic6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPamela Urquhart vs Kathleen Galioto6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKellye Richelderfer / Jacqueline Degrasse vs Patty Aoyama / BECKY MAGNUSON6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs EW-PC-WestWon 32
L#1 DoublesJessica Rottweiler / Jennifer Terami vs Mauri Morgan / Shaelah Harmon6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Michael vs Jaelynne King6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Degrasse / Bri Plath vs Rikki West / Danielle Dunigan2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLisa Vold vs Rebecca Hiles6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPamela Urquhart / Erika Mullins vs Tina Duncan / Tiffany Hebdon3-6, 5-5
2026-03-20vs YTC-Lucky ShotsLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Terami / Jill Christianson vs Beata Miller / Jennilyn Evans7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Vold vs Lisa Watkins1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Rottweiler / Sarah Michael vs Amy Helms / Kathleen McIver6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJacqueline Degrasse vs Kayla Robins2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBri Plath / Pamela Urquhart vs Tiffany Lundberg / Judi Harris6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Sarah Michael
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Jennifer Terami
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.91
Lisa Vold
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jill Christianson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Jessica Rottweiler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Bri Plath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Pamela Urquhart
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Jacqueline Degrasse
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Valerie Hull
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.43
Erika Mullins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.24
Kellye Richelderfer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Terami + Sarah Michael5161% games+15.3% vs expected
Jill Christianson + Jennifer Terami6162% games+10.7% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Bri Plath3745% games+8.7% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Pamela Urquhart3241% games−0.4% vs expected
Jennifer Terami + Bri Plath0544% games−1.8% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Jennifer Terami123 matchesnot enough data
Jill Christianson + Jessica Rottweiler033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Terami + Jessica Rottweiler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah Michael
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jennifer Terami
43W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Lisa Vold
52W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Jill Christianson
73W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Jessica Rottweiler
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Bri Plath
20W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Pamela Urquhart
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Jacqueline Degrasse
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Valerie Hull
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Erika Mullins
26W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Kellye Richelderfer
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.