Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW5.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 5.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
3.33
Susie Hansen
published
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.14
Michaela Katari
published
3.14
Rebecca Bergman
published
3.05
Katie Hamlin
published
3.02
Mickie Kerr
published
2.81
Carrie Iturreria
published 3
2.80
Kerry Maunus
published
2.74
Jamie Damaschino
published 3
2.74
2.74
Stacie Jessee
published
2.70
Wendy Haworth
published
2.68
Cat Corcoran
published 3
2.67
Shelly Cuny
published
2.67
Janet Sconza Angers
published
2.65
Raylinn Bianchi
published
2.55
Maria Angel-Ordonez
published
2.45
Rene Zocchi
published
2.15
Amy Bame
published 2.5
Robin Azevedo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michaela Katari + Katie Hamlin7071% games+6.5% vs expected
Raylinn Bianchi + Janet Sconza Angers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Hilary Andersen Hurlbut
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Michaela Katari
46W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
Rebecca Bergman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.14
Katie Hamlin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Carrie Iturreria
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kerry Maunus
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Jamie Damaschino
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Danielle Cranston
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Stacie Jessee
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Wendy Haworth
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cat Corcoran
0W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Shelly Cuny
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Janet Sconza Angers
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Raylinn Bianchi
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Maria Angel-Ordonez
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
0%35%65%
2.55
Rene Zocchi
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Amy Bame
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Robin Azevedo
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.