Teams

LOCH.Kasberg

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-28vs TOC.HorowitzLost 01
L#2 DoublesBob Cwikla / Stephen Jeltema vs Jon Rodriguez / Eduardo Delossantos2-6, 4-6
2024-09-21vs CAS.LabieWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Trevor Hoyles vs Eric Schraibman / Michael Stone7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Jeltema / Bob Cwikla vs Dustin Adams / Josh Kimsey7-5, 6-1
2024-09-14vs TOC.KumarLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Bob Cwikla vs Guru Mallesh / Manik Parsa1-6, 3-6
2024-09-05vs TOC.SteetLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Keith Kasberg vs John Nealis / Blair Lilly1-6, 1-6
2024-08-17vs PW.HaywardLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Mcalpin / Bob Cwikla vs Alan Shepherd / Francois Laflamme4-6, 5-7
2024-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Mark Wolff vs Chris Johnson / Blair Lilly0-6, 2-6
2024-08-03vs TOC.HorowitzWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Jeltema / Bob Cwikla vs Peter Olmos / Chip Pope6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Trevor Hoyles
published
3.12
Daryn Watson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.84
Bob Cwikla
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Mark Wolff
published
2.65
Keith Kasberg
published
2.51
John Mcalpin
published
2.38
Johnny Blevins
published
2.30
Robert Bone
published
Stephen Jeltema
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daryn Watson + Bob Cwikla2442% gamesnot enough data
Johnny Blevins + Keith Kasberg033 matchesnot enough data
Keith Kasberg + John Mcalpin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevor Hoyles
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Bob Cwikla
40W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Mark Wolff
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Keith Kasberg
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
John Mcalpin
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Johnny Blevins
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Robert Bone
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.30
Stephen Jeltema
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.