Teams

TOC.Cuccaro

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-23vs ACP.LowranceWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarti Crane / Kristine Pelt vs Susan Omell / Yuko Resseguie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Patton / Lonnie Sroka vs Patty Parrnelli / Stacey Stephens6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Williams / Shelly Jude vs Beate Steffen / Lydia Pasteris6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs ACP.LowranceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Patton / Lonnie Sroka vs Kimberly Latzy / Jennifer Wolborsky6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Nikki DAmbrose vs Karen Johnston / Stacey Stephens7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Diane Patton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Nikki DAmbrose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Marti Crane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Jane Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Virginia Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kristine Pelt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Helen Cuccaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Nancy Haire
published
3.18
Shelly Jude
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Lonnie Sroka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Julie Tapp
published 3.5
2.96
Lindsay Stover
published
Janel Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Lewis + Helen Cuccaro3349% games−5.9% vs expected
Lonnie Sroka + Julie Tapp0538% gamesnot enough data
Helen Cuccaro + Jane Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Helen Cuccaro + Nikki DAmbrose314 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Lewis + Nancy Haire213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Williams + Diane Patton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Patton
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Nikki DAmbrose
308W–267L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Marti Crane
125W–116L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Jane Williams
306W–299L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Virginia Lewis
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Kristine Pelt
154W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Helen Cuccaro
129W–198L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Nancy Haire
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–160L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lonnie Sroka
38W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Julie Tapp
116W–134L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lindsay Stover
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Janel Green
17W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.