Teams

Oakwood - Kinney

2025 Adult 40 & Over Women Fall Day-Mobile · 3.0 Women Day 40+

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Day 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kathy Clark
published
2.97
Amy Kendall
published 3
2.91
Deanne Pollara
published 3
2.81
Christie Keller
published 3
2.76
Susan Nonnenmacher
published
2.67
Theresa Perry
published
2.64
Sheila Mahoney
published
2.60
Reenie Kinney
published
2.59
Traci Fusaiotti
published
2.52
Tena Baine
published
2.52
Tracy Porter
published
2.49
Maureen Lowe
published
2.29
Susan Groom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kendall + Kathy Clark13366% games+9.1% vs expected
Reenie Kinney + Kathy Clark3347% games+6.2% vs expected
Susan Nonnenmacher + Traci Fusaiotti4550% games+4.8% vs expected
Susan Groom + Susan Nonnenmacher2440% games+3.5% vs expected
Theresa Perry + Susan Nonnenmacher3349% games−0.1% vs expected
Susan Nonnenmacher + Christie Keller4253% games−8.1% vs expected
Reenie Kinney + Susan Nonnenmacher213 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Perry + Kathy Clark123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Clark
73W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3
Amy Kendall
44W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Deanne Pollara
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Christie Keller
18W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Susan Nonnenmacher
21W–39L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Theresa Perry
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Sheila Mahoney
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Reenie Kinney
28W–52L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Traci Fusaiotti
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Tena Baine
12W–40L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Tracy Porter
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Maureen Lowe
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Susan Groom
7W–36L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.