Teams

NMeredith (Carmel)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs VShannon (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Andrea Whitmore vs Carmen Lettre / Kimberlee Curley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer George / Tricia Magee vs Crystal Rowe / Theresa Joiner6-3, 6-0
2025-09-23vs SNoot (Firethorn/CCoC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesBrooke Cole / Tricia Magee vs Nanda Hashe / Sheri Noot6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChelsea Rhodes / Julia Rafferty vs Denise Howard / Caitlin McGrath6-0, 6-1
2025-09-16vs ASmith/BDunn (PPRSC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Andrea Whitmore vs Virginia Schmidt / Joan Carney6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCasey Fuller / Keri Beach vs Chelsea Caudill / Nanci Weil7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-09vs LMadonna (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKeri Beach / Tricia Magee vs Kelly Keen / Randi Trojan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Chelsea Rhodes vs Pamela Trantham / Carron Flinter6-2, 6-4
2025-09-02vs DCallinan (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Andrea Whitmore vs Margaret Miller / Melissa Moloney6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeri Beach / Laurie Diman vs Lisa Carmichael / Summer Nunn6-2, 6-1
2025-08-26vs KSalina (PCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer George / Chelsea Rhodes vs Larissa Soto / Laurie Eatman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Casey Fuller vs Brenley Ogden / Melissa Pavlovich6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrooke Cole / Laurie Diman vs Megan Papadakis / Lauren Williams6-0, 6-2
2025-08-12vs VShannon (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Keri Beach vs Elizabeth Harvey / Jennifer Tucker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNadia Meredith / Laurie Diman vs Vicky Shannon / Lucinda Supernavage6-4, 6-3
2025-08-05vs SNoot (Firethorn/CCoC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPaige Jones / Tricia Magee vs Jill Ytterstad / Tracy McLaughlin6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKeri Beach / Laurie Diman vs Sheri Noot / Caitlin McGrath6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Catherine Bauer
published 3.5
3.06
Laurie Diman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.01
Chelsea Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Tricia Magee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Keri Beach
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Andrea Whitmore
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.67
Casey Fuller
published 3
2.60
Claire Sillner
published 3
2.50
Jennifer George
published
2.40
Nadia Meredith
published
2.35
Tiffany Ashmore
published
2.28
Brooke Cole
published 2.5
2.13
Julia Rafferty
published
Sarah Moody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Magee + Keri Beach4265% games+13.8% vs expected
Laurie Diman + Keri Beach3261% games+7.4% vs expected
Chelsea Rhodes + Laurie Diman8354% games+0.3% vs expected
Laurie Diman + Tricia Magee242251% games−3.6% vs expected
Keri Beach + Andrea Whitmore3252% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Rhodes + Tricia Magee404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Bauer
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
Laurie Diman
121W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Chelsea Rhodes
64W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Tricia Magee
122W–94L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Keri Beach
45W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Andrea Whitmore
30W–36L career · type A · 11 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Casey Fuller
6W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Claire Sillner
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jennifer George
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Nadia Meredith
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Tiffany Ashmore
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Brooke Cole
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Julia Rafferty
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Sarah Moody
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.