Teams

Impastato/18/5.5/MCC

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

20 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kazik/18+/5.5/GACC000000
2Impastato/18/5.5/MCC000000
3Spansel /18+/5.5/CP000000
4Barrington/18+/5.5/CP000000
5Worsley/18/5.5/NOLTC000000
6Dunn/18+/5.5/NOCC000000
7Ackerman/18+/5.5/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Macey Osorno
published
3.15
Ashley Gootee
published 3
3.09
Nicole Rittiner
published
3.09
Heidi Dugan
published
3.02
Kathleen Kazour
published
3.02
Catherine Hollander
published 2.5
2.98
Kathryn Wild
published
2.96
Tania Giambrone
published
2.81
Lori Rabito
published
2.75
Rebecca DeVerges
published
2.73
Kristin Offner
published
2.57
Lauren Schonekas
published
2.55
Erin Oest-Larsen
published 3
2.49
Christina Delucca
published 2.5
2.44
Katie Impastato
published
2.37
Kate Brownlee
published
2.31
Kasey Rumore
published
Donna Brown
published
Emily Roy
published
Noreen Bonifacic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Wild + Kathleen Kazour9360% games+0.7% vs expected
Lori Rabito + Kathleen Kazour224 matchesnot enough data
Tania Giambrone + Kristin Offner404 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Schonekas + Kasey Rumore224 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Gootee + Tania Giambrone303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Gootee + Nicole Rittiner303 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca DeVerges + Lauren Schonekas303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Impastato + Christina Delucca213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Macey Osorno
42W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
Ashley Gootee
26W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Nicole Rittiner
15W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Heidi Dugan
13W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Kathleen Kazour
19W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
2.5
Catherine Hollander
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Kathryn Wild
28W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tania Giambrone
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Lori Rabito
21W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Rebecca DeVerges
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
Kristin Offner
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Lauren Schonekas
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Erin Oest-Larsen
21W–44L career · type A · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Christina Delucca
15W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Katie Impastato
15W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Kate Brownlee
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Kasey Rumore
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Donna Brown
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Roy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Noreen Bonifacic
10W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.