Teams

Team 2 BWB

2024 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs Team 5 Great Falls of FireSplit 11
W#1 DoublesQun Bi / FENG LI vs Judson Brown / Marguerite McFadden7-5, 5-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Wang / Xiaoli Liang vs Ben Jackson / Karyn DeVito6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-02vs Team 3 PiF 40 (7.0)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesFENG LI / Qun Bi vs Mike Burgoyne / Sheryl Morley3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesXiaoli Liang / Richard Wang vs Chip Hathaway / Desiree Drakakis1-6, 1-6
2024-05-19vs Team 7 Volley RanchersWon 10
W#3 DoublesFENG LI / Xiaoli Liang vs Anton Malkowski / Sharon Petri6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Team 12 CourtmastersWon 10
W#2 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Qun Bi vs Indre Conners / John Glass6-1, 7-5
2024-04-21vs Team 11 HighStrungWon 10
W#3 DoublesQun Bi / XIAOCHUN JI vs Andrea Gevas / Daniel Aronowitz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs Team 8 Serves You RightWon 10
W#1 DoublesYuan Zhang / M Zhu vs Ronnie Hamad / Stacy Rodrigues6-2, 6-1
2024-04-07vs Team 13 Smart AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesQun Bi / XIAOCHUN JI vs Brian Barnett / Elizabeth Young5-7, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
M Zhu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Shan Wang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.52
Qun Bi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.51
Yuan Zhang
published
3.45
XIAOCHUN JI
published
3.39
Jianli Pan
published
3.32
FENG LI
published
3.31
TingTing Du
published
3.22
Alan Zhang
published 3.5
2.95
Xiaoli Liang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Richard Wang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
M Zhu
49W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Tana Jankowiak
96W–69L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Qun Bi
74W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Yuan Zhang
47W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
XIAOCHUN JI
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jianli Pan
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
FENG LI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
TingTing Du
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alan Zhang
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Xiaoli Liang
46W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Richard Wang
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.