Teams

RJampani (Blakeney)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-19vs NMeredith (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Carolina Abranches / Christine Lee vs Lara Aboulhosn / Stefania Faraj0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPayal K / Radhika Jampani vs Nadia Meredith / Laurie Diman4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPurnima Kunwor / Melanie Cox vs Caroline Dudley / Paige Jones3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesChristine Lee / Kinnera Angadi vs Sue Ann Lang / Julie Moran6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Sridevi Ganesan vs Patty Sweeney / Jill Ytterstad6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeeDee Fanning / Cristiane Carani vs Nanda Hashe / Karisa Douglas3-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs AMcCurry (Carmel)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDeeDee Fanning / Purnima Kunwor vs Lisa Beebe / Anne McCurry3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Cox / Sarah Danford vs Casey Fuller / Lisa Shaw1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Lorena Giraldo vs Julie Clements / Julia Rafferty6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Sridevi Ganesan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Kinnera Angadi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Lorena Giraldo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
DeeDee Fanning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.31
Ana Carolina Abranches
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Radhika Jampani
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Payal K
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Purnima Kunwor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Cristiane Carani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sarah Danford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radhika Jampani + Lorena Giraldo134 matchesnot enough data
Ana Carolina Abranches + Lorena Giraldo404 matchesnot enough data
DeeDee Fanning + Purnima Kunwor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sridevi Ganesan
62W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kinnera Angadi
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Lorena Giraldo
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
3
DeeDee Fanning
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Ana Carolina Abranches
10W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Radhika Jampani
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Payal K
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Purnima Kunwor
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Cristiane Carani
1W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Sarah Danford
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.