Teams

KY/LOU/MARQUETTE

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 3.5 MIXED

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-09vs KY/LOU/GORDINIERWon 30
W#1 DoublesElena Marquette / Ross Walton vs Christine Shenk / John Schriber6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Nolan / Thomas Heavrin vs Deanna Gordinier / Joshua Hafer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAbigail Scott / Matthew Monroe vs Susan Reale / Jesse Mudd7-6, 7-6
2026-08-01vs KY/LOU/CALDWELLLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Marquette / Kathleen Lane vs Swapna Deo / Nikhil Deo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Heavrin / Emily Nolan vs Mallory Caldwell / Jason Caldwell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChangbing Hu / Soojung Jung vs Jennifer Solinger / Thomas Solinger1-6, 6-7
2026-07-03vs KY/LOU/CECIL/LUCKETTWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Lane / Kathleen Lane vs Alexandra Lewis / Jacob Lewis6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElena Marquette / Michael Marquette vs Allison Luckett / Michael Bliss3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlice Shade / Haixun Guo vs Annie Kuzmicky / Jesse Bray6-3, 6-4
2026-06-28vs KY/LOU/STEEN/DEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesChangbing Hu / Alice Shade vs Lisa Steen / Will Swope6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Marquette / Sara Robinson vs Alex Steen / Shannon Burnett6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Caudill / Elizabeth Curtin vs Amber Thieneman / Mike Thieneman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs KY/LOU/JENNINGS/GRAVELYWon 21
W#1 DoublesElena Marquette / Quentin Marquette vs Kristie Daugherty / Brendan Daugherty6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRoss Walton / Emily Nolan vs Kate Bailey / David Schoen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSydney Marquette / Gabriel Cora vs Nick Norcia / Kelsey Norcia6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Gabriel Cora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Elena Marquette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Soojung Jung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Changbing Hu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Alice Shade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Thomas Heavrin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ross Walton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Robert Caudill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Quentin Marquette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Abigail Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Michael Marquette
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Emily Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Haixun Guo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Bill French
published 3
Matthew Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sydney Marquette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Lane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Marquette + Quentin Marquette2346% games−0.0% vs expected
Elena Marquette + Michael Marquette41144% games−6.0% vs expected
Thomas Heavrin + Emily Nolan123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Heavrin + Alice Shade123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Nolan + Ross Walton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriel Cora
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Elena Marquette
27W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Soojung Jung
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Changbing Hu
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alice Shade
20W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Thomas Heavrin
17W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Ross Walton
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Robert Caudill
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
Quentin Marquette
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Abigail Scott
4W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
Michael Marquette
19W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
Elizabeth Curtin
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Emily Nolan
12W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Haixun Guo
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Bill French
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
2.58
Matthew Monroe
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sydney Marquette
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tom Lane
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.