Teams

Empire Tennis

2025 18&Over Men · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-22vs ROC: Wolf PackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMitch Linder / Benjamin Webb vs Xunyi Xu / Mark Liu1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesYi Xu vs Brendan McGlynn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs ROC: Full Metal RacquetsWon 10
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Webb vs J Storey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-15vs ROC: Full Metal RacquetsLost 01
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Webb vs Ankur Mody3-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs ROC: Wolf PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesYi Xu / Mitch Linder vs David Gibbons / Chris Fisher2-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs ROC: Wolf PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Webb / Jesse Allen vs Brendan McGlynn / Ray Kim4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-23vs ROC: Full Metal RacquetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Webb / Alex Abrams vs Grant Avery / Jesse Allen2-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs ROC: Full Metal RacquetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Abrams / Benjamin Webb vs John-Charles Dimperio / Mark Weimer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs ROC: Wolf PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Maffia / Mitch Linder vs Brendan McGlynn / Ray Kim5-7, 1-6
2025-05-27vs ROC: Full Metal RacquetsLost 01
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Webb vs J Storey1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Tim Lyon
published
2.91
Benjamin Webb
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.81
Steven Buckley
published
2.76
Daniel Maffia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Dale Dorsett
published 2.5
Alex Abrams
published 2.5
Justin Demartin
published
Robert Estephan
published
Yi Xu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Buckley + Dale Dorsett0621% games−10.1% vs expected
Yi Xu + Steven Buckley0519% gamesnot enough data
Steven Buckley + Daniel Maffia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Lyon
9W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Benjamin Webb
12W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Steven Buckley
10W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Daniel Maffia
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
2.5
Dale Dorsett
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Alex Abrams
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Demartin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Estephan
0W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yi Xu
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.